flagship

Gpt 5 vs Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct

Side-by-side pricing, context window, features, and per-use-case verdict. Data sourced from LiteLLM, updated regularly.

Specifications

Feature Gpt 5 Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct
Provider openai groq
Model ID gpt-5 groq/meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Input / 1M tokens $1.25 $0.20 (84% cheaper)
Output / 1M tokens $10.00 $0.60 (94% cheaper)
Cached input / 1M $0.13
Context window 272kk tokens 131kk tokens
Max output 128kk tokens 8kk tokens
Vision
Function calling
Prompt caching
Web search
JSON schema

Monthly cost comparison

No cache discount applied — pure token costs at three usage scales.

Scale Gpt 5 Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct Winner
Small
1M in / 0.2M out
$3.25 $0.32 Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct saves 90%
Medium
10M in / 2M out
$32.50 $3.20 Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct saves 90%
Large
100M in / 20M out
$325 $32.00 Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct saves 90%

Category winners

Cheapest input
Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct
$0.20/M · 84% less than the other
Cheapest output
Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct
$0.60/M · 94% less than the other
Larger context
Gpt 5
272kk tokens · 108% larger window
More features
Gpt 5
5 / 5 capabilities

Better for…

High-volume RAG & repeated context
$0.13/M cached input — prompt caching makes repeated context retrieval significantly cheaper
Gpt 5
Short interactions & high-throughput APIs
$0.60/M output — 94% cheaper on output at scale
Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct
Long-document processing & large codebases
272k context window vs 131k — 108% larger context
Gpt 5
Agentic workflows & tool use
Supports 5 of 5 tracked capabilities (vision, function calling, caching, web search, JSON schema)
Gpt 5

Deep-dive on each model

Pricing data sourced from LiteLLM and refreshed regularly. Always verify with each provider's official pricing page before making business decisions.