open-source

Qwen Max vs Claude Sonnet 4 5

Side-by-side pricing, context window, features, and per-use-case verdict. Data sourced from LiteLLM, updated regularly.

Specifications

Feature Qwen Max Claude Sonnet 4 5
Provider dashscope anthropic
Model ID dashscope/qwen-max claude-sonnet-4-5
Input / 1M tokens $1.60 (47% cheaper) $3.00
Output / 1M tokens $6.40 (57% cheaper) $15.00
Cached input / 1M $0.30
Context window 31kk tokens 200kk tokens
Max output 8kk tokens 64kk tokens
Vision
Function calling
Prompt caching
Web search
JSON schema

Monthly cost comparison

No cache discount applied — pure token costs at three usage scales.

Scale Qwen Max Claude Sonnet 4 5 Winner
Small
1M in / 0.2M out
$2.88 $6.00 Qwen Max saves 52%
Medium
10M in / 2M out
$28.80 $60.00 Qwen Max saves 52%
Large
100M in / 20M out
$288 $600 Qwen Max saves 52%

Category winners

Cheapest input
Qwen Max
$1.60/M · 47% less than the other
Cheapest output
Qwen Max
$6.40/M · 57% less than the other
Larger context
Claude Sonnet 4 5
200kk tokens · 551% larger window
More features
Claude Sonnet 4 5
4 / 5 capabilities

Better for…

High-volume RAG & repeated context
$0.30/M cached input — prompt caching makes repeated context retrieval significantly cheaper
Claude Sonnet 4 5
Short interactions & high-throughput APIs
$6.40/M output — 57% cheaper on output at scale
Qwen Max
Long-document processing & large codebases
200k context window vs 31k — 551% larger context
Claude Sonnet 4 5
Agentic workflows & tool use
Supports 4 of 5 tracked capabilities (vision, function calling, caching, web search, JSON schema)
Claude Sonnet 4 5

Deep-dive on each model

Pricing data sourced from LiteLLM and refreshed regularly. Always verify with each provider's official pricing page before making business decisions.