budget

Qwen Turbo vs Claude Haiku 4 5

Side-by-side pricing, context window, features, and per-use-case verdict. Data sourced from LiteLLM, updated regularly.

Specifications

Feature Qwen Turbo Claude Haiku 4 5
Provider dashscope anthropic
Model ID dashscope/qwen-turbo claude-haiku-4-5
Input / 1M tokens $0.05 (95% cheaper) $1.00
Output / 1M tokens $0.20 (96% cheaper) $5.00
Cached input / 1M $0.10
Context window 129kk tokens 200kk tokens
Max output 16kk tokens 64kk tokens
Vision
Function calling
Prompt caching
Web search
JSON schema

Monthly cost comparison

No cache discount applied — pure token costs at three usage scales.

Scale Qwen Turbo Claude Haiku 4 5 Winner
Small
1M in / 0.2M out
$0.09 $2.00 Qwen Turbo saves 96%
Medium
10M in / 2M out
$0.90 $20.00 Qwen Turbo saves 96%
Large
100M in / 20M out
$9.00 $200 Qwen Turbo saves 96%

Category winners

Cheapest input
Qwen Turbo
$0.05/M · 95% less than the other
Cheapest output
Qwen Turbo
$0.20/M · 96% less than the other
Larger context
Claude Haiku 4 5
200kk tokens · 55% larger window
More features
Claude Haiku 4 5
4 / 5 capabilities

Better for…

High-volume RAG & repeated context
$0.10/M cached input — prompt caching makes repeated context retrieval significantly cheaper
Claude Haiku 4 5
Short interactions & high-throughput APIs
$0.20/M output — 96% cheaper on output at scale
Qwen Turbo
Long-document processing & large codebases
200k context window vs 129k — 55% larger context
Claude Haiku 4 5
Agentic workflows & tool use
Supports 4 of 5 tracked capabilities (vision, function calling, caching, web search, JSON schema)
Claude Haiku 4 5

Deep-dive on each model

Pricing data sourced from LiteLLM and refreshed regularly. Always verify with each provider's official pricing page before making business decisions.